ChainGPT vs Artificial Superintelligence Alliance

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) is 16.8× the size of ChainGPT (CGPT) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, FET is ahead by 26.9 percentage points (CGPT -62.9% against FET -36.0%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.56 across 399 shared trading days). FET has been the more volatile of the two, at 119% annualised against CGPT's 93%.

Correlation: 0.56
Size ratio: 1 : 16.8
Ahead over 1 year: FET

ChainGPTCGPT

$0.016690

24h: +2.96%
Market cap: $20.34M
Volume 24h: $513,484
Volatility (ann.): 93%

Artificial Superintelligence AllianceFET

$0.148200

24h: -7.52%
Market cap: $342.34M
Volume 24h: $77.65M
Volatility (ann.): 119%

CGPT 5.6%Share of the two combined market caps94.4% FET

Performance

CGPTFET

7 days-17.63%-12.24%FET
30 days-31.27%-40.03%CGPT
90 days-15.06%+4.52%FET
1 year-62.89%-35.95%FET

Correlation

0.56over 399 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4990d: 0.501y: 0.51

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CGPT	FET
Max drawdown (400d)	-81.1%	-79.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.18	0.04
Best 30 days (past year)	+101.1%	+77.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	-50.4%	-49.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: FET outperformed CGPT by 18.7% — measured on the CGPT/FET ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

ChainGPT →Artificial Superintelligence Alliance →