松狮犬 (Chow-chow) vs MemeCore

MemeCore (M) is 71899.2× the size of 松狮犬 (Chow-chow) (CHOW-CHOW) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, CHOW-CHOW is ahead by 12.9 percentage points (CHOW-CHOW -12.4% against M -25.3%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.22 across 23 shared trading days). M has been the more volatile of the two, at 107% annualised against CHOW-CHOW's 56%.

Correlation: 0.22
Size ratio: 1 : 71899.2
Ahead over 30 days: CHOW-CHOW

松狮犬 (Chow-chow)CHOW-CHOW

$2.627e-5

24h: -3.09%
Market cap: $26,270
Volume 24h: $21
Volatility (ann.): 56%

MemeCoreM

$0.823166

24h: -1.96%
Market cap: $1.89B
Volume 24h: $2.02M
Volatility (ann.): 107%

CHOW-CHOW 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% M

Performance

CHOW-CHOWM

7 days-12.53%-20.13%CHOW-CHOW
30 days-12.42%-25.32%CHOW-CHOW

Correlation

0.22over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CHOW-CHOW	M
Max drawdown (400d)	-15.3%	-41.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.22	-0.27

Relative strength over 90 days: CHOW-CHOW outperformed M by 2.7% — measured on the CHOW-CHOW/M ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

松狮犬 (Chow-chow) →MemeCore →