Chunking vs lium

lium (SN51) is 290.2× the size of Chunking (SN40) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN51 is ahead by 48.8 percentage points (SN40 -32.7% against SN51 +16.1%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.67 across 22 shared trading days). SN51 has been the more volatile of the two, at 140% annualised against SN40's 111%.

Correlation: 0.67
Size ratio: 1 : 290.2
Ahead over 30 days: SN51

ChunkingSN40

$0.383068

24h: -0.33%
Market cap: $482,243
Volume 24h: $1,123
Volatility (ann.): 111%

liumSN51

$27.6200

24h: +3.97%
Market cap: $139.94M
Volume 24h: $3.43M
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN40 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% SN51

Performance

SN40SN51

7 days-4.75%-13.99%SN40
30 days-32.66%+16.13%SN51

Correlation

0.67over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN40	SN51
Max drawdown (400d)	-42.9%	-19.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.29	0.59

Relative strength over 90 days: SN51 outperformed SN40 by 54.5% — measured on the SN40/SN51 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Chunking →lium →