Citrea vs Mantle

Mantle (MNT) is 74.1× the size of Citrea (CTR) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely in opposite directions (correlation -0.42 across 43 shared trading days). CTR has been the more volatile of the two, at 121% annualised against MNT's 100%.

Correlation: -0.42
Size ratio: 1 : 74.1

CitreaCTR

$0.014250

24h: +1.69%
Market cap: $21.38M
Volume 24h: $3.29M
Volatility (ann.): 121%

MantleMNT

$0.479689

24h: +1.63%
Market cap: $1.58B
Volume 24h: $41.65M
Volatility (ann.): 100%

CTR 1.3%Share of the two combined market caps98.7% MNT

Performance

CTRMNT

7 days-17.22%-8.39%MNT
30 days+49.50%-17.29%CTR
90 days+63.04%——

Correlation

-0.42over 43 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.4490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CTR	MNT
Max drawdown (400d)	-40.2%	-31.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.52	0.06

Relative strength over 90 days: CTR outperformed MNT by 50.6% — measured on the CTR/MNT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Citrea →Mantle →