Clank Uwu Model vs Fables
Clank Uwu Model (CUM) and Fables (FABLES) compared side by side. CUM has been the more volatile of the two, at 346% annualised against FABLES's 239%.
Clank Uwu Model (CUM) and Fables (FABLES) compared side by side. CUM has been the more volatile of the two, at 346% annualised against FABLES's 239%.
CUMFABLES
| Metric | CUM | FABLES |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -96.8% | -41.8% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.28 | — |