BTC$73,931.48▼ 0.42%ETH$2,053.82▼ 1.77%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$680.39▼ 0.93%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%XRP$1.05▼ 2.31%SOL$83.79▼ 1.17%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.49%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 0.19%HYPE$72.01▼ 1.99%ZEC$979.86▼ 14.60%XMR$118.70▲ 4.21%DOGE$0.0679▼ 2.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%LEO$9.22▼ 0.51%WBT$71.17▼ 0.34%LINK$10.34▼ 1.07%ADA$0.1761▼ 1.15%XLM$0.1471▲ 0.69%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%NEAR$3.75▲ 3.20%BCH$228.50▼ 3.22%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%LTC$51.02▼ 0.59%UNI$6.43▼ 7.37%AVAX$8.53▲ 2.53%CC$0.0921▲ 0.44%SUI$0.8297▼ 0.37%GRAM$1.22▲ 11.47%XAUT$4,033.91▼ 0.75%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.004234▲ 4.34%HBAR$0.0659▼ 1.29%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%USDG$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▲ 0.17%QNT$177.75▼ 5.01%TAO$219.70▼ 0.06%CRO$0.0480▲ 1.10%BTC$73,931.48▼ 0.42%ETH$2,053.82▼ 1.77%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$680.39▼ 0.93%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%XRP$1.05▼ 2.31%SOL$83.79▼ 1.17%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.49%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 0.19%HYPE$72.01▼ 1.99%ZEC$979.86▼ 14.60%XMR$118.70▲ 4.21%DOGE$0.0679▼ 2.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%LEO$9.22▼ 0.51%WBT$71.17▼ 0.34%LINK$10.34▼ 1.07%ADA$0.1761▼ 1.15%XLM$0.1471▲ 0.69%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%NEAR$3.75▲ 3.20%BCH$228.50▼ 3.22%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%LTC$51.02▼ 0.59%UNI$6.43▼ 7.37%AVAX$8.53▲ 2.53%CC$0.0921▲ 0.44%SUI$0.8297▼ 0.37%GRAM$1.22▲ 11.47%XAUT$4,033.91▼ 0.75%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.004234▲ 4.34%HBAR$0.0659▼ 1.29%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%USDG$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▲ 0.17%QNT$177.75▼ 5.01%TAO$219.70▼ 0.06%CRO$0.0480▲ 1.10%

Clank Uwu Model vs GREEN MORNING

Clank Uwu Model (CUM) and GREEN MORNING (GM) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, CUM is ahead by 5.9 percentage points (CUM -93.9% against GM -99.8%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.39 across 35 shared trading days). GM has been the more volatile of the two, at 548472% annualised against CUM's 346%.

Correlation
0.39
Ahead over 30 days
CUM
Clank Uwu ModelCUM

$5.223e-6

24h
-1.65%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$24
Volatility (ann.)
346%
GREEN MORNINGGM

$0.003109

24h
+14.73%
Market cap
$3.11M
Volume 24h
$1.87M
Volatility (ann.)
548472%
CUM 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% GM

Performance

CUMGM

  1. 7 days-84.30%+13.87%GM
  2. 30 days-93.89%-99.79%CUM

Correlation

0.39over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricCUMGM
Max drawdown (400d)-96.8%-100.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.280.00

Relative strength over 90 days: GM outperformed CUM by 97.0% — measured on the CUM/GM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.