Clanker Torture Chamber vs Bordrless

Bordrless (BORDR) is 1.8× the size of Clanker Torture Chamber (SAW) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SAW is ahead by 25.1 percentage points (SAW -74.7% against BORDR -99.8%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.05 across 31 shared trading days). SAW has been the more volatile of the two, at 1407% annualised against BORDR's 907%.

Correlation: -0.05
Size ratio: 1 : 1.8
Ahead over 30 days: SAW

Clanker Torture ChamberSAW

$7.810e-6

24h: —
Market cap: $7,547
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 1407%

BordrlessBORDR

$1.323e-5

24h: -10.45%
Market cap: $13,231
Volume 24h: $950,857
Volatility (ann.): 907%

SAW 36.3%Share of the two combined market caps63.7% BORDR

Performance

SAWBORDR

7 days-36.98%-35.56%BORDR
30 days-74.69%-99.81%SAW

Correlation

-0.05over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SAW	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-97.0%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.07	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: SAW outperformed BORDR by 675.5% — measured on the SAW/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Clanker Torture Chamber →Bordrless →