CLAWBSTER vs ARGUE.FUN

ARGUE.FUN ($ARGUE) is 11.4× the size of CLAWBSTER (CLAWBSTER) by market capitalisation. Over the past 90 days, $ARGUE is ahead by 34.2 percentage points (CLAWBSTER -11.7% against $ARGUE +22.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.33 across 132 shared trading days). CLAWBSTER has been the more volatile of the two, at 1034% annualised against $ARGUE's 112%.

Correlation: 0.33
Size ratio: 1 : 11.4
Ahead over 90 days: $ARGUE

CLAWBSTERCLAWBSTER

$2.666e-7

24h: —
Market cap: $26,655
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 1034%

ARGUE.FUN$ARGUE

$3.980e-6

24h: —
Market cap: $302,547
Volume 24h: $166
Volatility (ann.): 112%

CLAWBSTER 8.1%Share of the two combined market caps91.9% $ARGUE

Performance

CLAWBSTER$ARGUE

7 days-17.54%-0.64%$ARGUE
30 days+13.04%-13.01%CLAWBSTER
90 days-11.70%+22.53%$ARGUE

Correlation

0.33over 132 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5790d: 0.551y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CLAWBSTER	$ARGUE
Max drawdown (400d)	-92.6%	-84.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.16	0.30

Relative strength over 90 days: CLAWBSTER outperformed $ARGUE by 14.1% — measured on the CLAWBSTER/$ARGUE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

CLAWBSTER →ARGUE.FUN →