clawd.atg.eth vs OriginTrail

OriginTrail (TRAC) is 392.0× the size of clawd.atg.eth (CLAWD) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, TRAC is ahead by 26.4 percentage points (CLAWD -21.8% against TRAC +4.7%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.48 across 27 shared trading days). CLAWD has been the more volatile of the two, at 227% annualised against TRAC's 104%.

Correlation: 0.48
Size ratio: 1 : 392.0
Ahead over 30 days: TRAC

clawd.atg.ethCLAWD

$4.010e-6

24h: +3.32%
Market cap: $385,864
Volume 24h: $108,138
Volatility (ann.): 227%

OriginTrailTRAC

$0.338157

24h: +0.51%
Market cap: $151.25M
Volume 24h: $1.96M
Volatility (ann.): 104%

CLAWD 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% TRAC

Performance

CLAWDTRAC

7 days-33.97%-7.03%TRAC
30 days-21.75%+4.69%TRAC

Correlation

0.48over 27 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CLAWD	TRAC
Max drawdown (400d)	-61.2%	-22.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.20	0.29

Relative strength over 90 days: TRAC outperformed CLAWD by 47.9% — measured on the CLAWD/TRAC ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

clawd.atg.eth →OriginTrail →