BTC$76,120.82▼ 5.41%ETH$2,253.48▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.81▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.52▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,237.64▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.28▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.77▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1833▼ 6.72%BCH$275.20▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1540▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.25▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8524▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,089.93▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.06▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.50▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,120.82▼ 5.41%ETH$2,253.48▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.81▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.52▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,237.64▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.28▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.77▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1833▼ 6.72%BCH$275.20▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1540▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.25▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8524▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,089.93▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.06▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.50▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

Clustr vs Render

Render (RENDER) is 15169.0× the size of Clustr (CLUSTR) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.32 across 183 shared trading days). CLUSTR has been the more volatile of the two, at 148% annualised against RENDER's 95%.

Correlation
0.32
Size ratio
1 : 15169.0
ClustrCLUSTR

$0.000104

24h
—
Market cap
$53,476
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
148%
RenderRENDER

$1.5320

24h
-3.30%
Market cap
$811.18M
Volume 24h
$35.22M
Volatility (ann.)
95%
CLUSTR 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% RENDER

Performance

CLUSTRRENDER

  1. 7 days+7.76%-5.87%CLUSTR
  2. 30 days+45.47%-22.32%CLUSTR
  3. 90 days+15.38%+19.61%RENDER
  4. 1 year—-13.86%—

Correlation

0.32over 183 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5190d: 0.391y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricCLUSTRRENDER
Max drawdown (400d)-93.5%-66.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.160.26
Best 30 days (past year)—+82.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-49.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: RENDER outperformed CLUSTR by 6.4% — measured on the CLUSTR/RENDER ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.