COCA vs THAT
COCA (COCA) and THAT (THAT) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.24 across 30 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 58% annualised.
- Correlation
- -0.24
COCA (COCA) and THAT (THAT) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.24 across 30 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 58% annualised.
COCATHAT
-0.24over 30 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | COCA | THAT |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -40.3% | -10.8% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.13 | 0.12 |
Relative strength over 90 days: THAT outperformed COCA by 10.6% — measured on the COCA/THAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.