Comando vs Bordrless

Comando (COMANDO) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, COMANDO is ahead by 1.4 percentage points (COMANDO -98.4% against BORDR -99.8%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.49 across 20 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 907% annualised against COMANDO's 360%.

Correlation: 0.49
Ahead over 30 days: COMANDO

ComandoCOMANDO

$1.477e-6

24h: -0.11%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $0
Volatility (ann.): 360%

BordrlessBORDR

$1.323e-5

24h: -10.45%
Market cap: $13,231
Volume 24h: $950,857
Volatility (ann.): 907%

COMANDO 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

COMANDOBORDR

7 days-12.92%-35.56%COMANDO
30 days-98.38%-99.81%COMANDO

Correlation

0.49over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	COMANDO	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-98.4%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.27	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: COMANDO outperformed BORDR by 2419.0% — measured on the COMANDO/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Comando →Bordrless →