dogwifhat (WIF) is 1339.1× the size of Cost Hot Dog (COST) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.55 across 35 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against COST's 44%.
COSTWIF
0.55over 35 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | COST | WIF |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -25.5% | -83.1% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.52 | 0.21 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +57.5% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -50.5% |
Relative strength over 90 days: COST outperformed WIF by 13.3% — measured on the COST/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.