BTC$76,120.82▼ 5.41%ETH$2,253.48▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.81▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.52▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,237.64▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.28▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.77▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1833▼ 6.72%BCH$275.20▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1540▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.25▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8524▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,089.93▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.06▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.50▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,120.82▼ 5.41%ETH$2,253.48▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.81▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.52▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,237.64▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.28▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.77▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1833▼ 6.72%BCH$275.20▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1540▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.25▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8524▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,089.93▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.06▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.50▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

CryingNTheCasino vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 6810.3× the size of CryingNTheCasino (TEARY) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.06 across 30 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 104% annualised.

Correlation
-0.06
Size ratio
1 : 6810.3
CryingNTheCasinoTEARY

$2.405e-5

24h
-8.34%
Market cap
$23,994
Volume 24h
$508
Volatility (ann.)
103%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164000

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
TEARY 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

TEARYWIF

  1. 7 days-16.84%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-56.05%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.06over 30 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricTEARYWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-56.3%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.540.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed TEARY by 35.7% — measured on the TEARY/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.