Crystal Stones vs Collector Crypt

Collector Crypt (CARDS) is 1775.3× the size of Crystal Stones (CRYSTAL STONES) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, CARDS is ahead by 114.4 percentage points (CRYSTAL STONES -17.1% against CARDS +97.4%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.10 across 23 shared trading days). CARDS has been the more volatile of the two, at 224% annualised against CRYSTAL STONES's 158%.

Correlation: -0.10
Size ratio: 1 : 1775.3
Ahead over 30 days: CARDS

Crystal StonesCRYSTAL STONES

$0.001336

24h: +3.24%
Market cap: $138,877
Volume 24h: $867
Volatility (ann.): 158%

Collector CryptCARDS

$0.276734

24h: +5.34%
Market cap: $246.55M
Volume 24h: $35.45M
Volatility (ann.): 224%

CRYSTAL STONES 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% CARDS

Performance

CRYSTAL STONESCARDS

7 days-13.86%-15.78%CRYSTAL STONES
30 days-17.07%+97.36%CARDS

Correlation

-0.10over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CRYSTAL STONES	CARDS
Max drawdown (400d)	-47.4%	-44.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.23	0.21

Relative strength over 90 days: CRYSTAL STONES outperformed CARDS by 10.9% — measured on the CRYSTAL STONES/CARDS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Crystal Stones →Collector Crypt →