BTC$80,714.26▲ 5.09%ETH$2,429.94▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.74▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.20▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3197▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,309.60▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.19▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.50▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1979▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1688▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.04▲ 7.53%UNI$7.66▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.24▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.78▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9293▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,105.57▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.49%QNT$203.70▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,714.26▲ 5.09%ETH$2,429.94▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.74▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.20▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3197▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,309.60▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.19▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.50▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1979▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1688▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.04▲ 7.53%UNI$7.66▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.24▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.78▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9293▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,105.57▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.49%QNT$203.70▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

CyberLeek vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 109.9× the size of CyberLeek (CYBERLEEK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.05 across 39 shared trading days). CYBERLEEK has been the more volatile of the two, at 386% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.05
Size ratio
1 : 109.9
CyberLeekCYBERLEEK

$0.002150

24h
+15.54%
Market cap
$1.57M
Volume 24h
$1.23M
Volatility (ann.)
386%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.172700

24h
+1.28%
Market cap
$172.38M
Volume 24h
$31.26M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
CYBERLEEK 0.9%Share of the two combined market caps99.1% WIF

Performance

CYBERLEEKWIF

  1. 7 days+16.65%-7.39%CYBERLEEK
  2. 30 days+221.03%-32.13%CYBERLEEK
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.05over 39 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricCYBERLEEKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-83.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.080.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed CYBERLEEK by 20.6% — measured on the CYBERLEEK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.