BTC$77,563.13▼ 1.36%ETH$2,314.07▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$696.11▼ 1.07%XRP$1.27▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$91.92▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3174▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,254.35▼ 4.13%HYPE$79.82▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0735▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$11.01▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1880▼ 2.87%BCH$281.20▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1594▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.82▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$7.08▼ 5.21%LTC$53.56▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.44▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8774▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,088.88▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.12▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0693▼ 4.25%QNT$196.93▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$223.30▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%BTC$77,563.13▼ 1.36%ETH$2,314.07▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$696.11▼ 1.07%XRP$1.27▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$91.92▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3174▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,254.35▼ 4.13%HYPE$79.82▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0735▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$11.01▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1880▼ 2.87%BCH$281.20▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1594▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.82▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$7.08▼ 5.21%LTC$53.56▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.44▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8774▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,088.88▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.12▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0693▼ 4.25%QNT$196.93▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$223.30▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%

Daboo vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 804.5× the size of Daboo (DABOO) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.66 across 176 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 104% annualised.

Correlation
0.66
Size ratio
1 : 804.5
DabooDABOO

$0.000213

24h
—
Market cap
$208,209
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
103%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.166700

24h
-4.99%
Market cap
$167.51M
Volume 24h
$28.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
DABOO 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% WIF

Performance

DABOOWIF

  1. 7 days-20.82%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days+25.63%-32.13%DABOO
  3. 90 days+4.75%+21.70%WIF
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.66over 176 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6790d: 0.631y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricDABOOWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-79.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.050.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: DABOO outperformed WIF by 9.4% — measured on the DABOO/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.