BTC$80,838.70▲ 4.92%ETH$2,430.43▲ 7.27%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.04%BNB$719.61▲ 3.81%XRP$1.31▲ 4.38%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.11▲ 4.58%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.83%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,303.90▲ 8.75%HYPE$84.35▲ 2.61%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.33%XMR$118.70▲ 1.54%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.97▲ 5.57%LINK$11.45▲ 5.54%LEO$9.36▲ 0.21%ADA$0.1977▲ 5.72%XLM$0.1685▲ 5.55%BCH$283.20▲ 4.52%NEAR$4.02▲ 6.70%UNI$7.67▲ 8.40%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.28▲ 5.65%RAIN$0.005979▼ 7.72%CC$0.1002▲ 3.92%AVAX$8.76▲ 4.38%SUI$0.9333▲ 6.20%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.23%XAUT$4,103.57▲ 3.72%HBAR$0.0729▲ 6.51%QNT$203.62▲ 6.80%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.10%TAO$236.80▲ 6.79%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0522▲ 5.10%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,838.70▲ 4.92%ETH$2,430.43▲ 7.27%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.04%BNB$719.61▲ 3.81%XRP$1.31▲ 4.38%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.11▲ 4.58%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.83%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,303.90▲ 8.75%HYPE$84.35▲ 2.61%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.33%XMR$118.70▲ 1.54%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.97▲ 5.57%LINK$11.45▲ 5.54%LEO$9.36▲ 0.21%ADA$0.1977▲ 5.72%XLM$0.1685▲ 5.55%BCH$283.20▲ 4.52%NEAR$4.02▲ 6.70%UNI$7.67▲ 8.40%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.28▲ 5.65%RAIN$0.005979▼ 7.72%CC$0.1002▲ 3.92%AVAX$8.76▲ 4.38%SUI$0.9333▲ 6.20%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.23%XAUT$4,103.57▲ 3.72%HBAR$0.0729▲ 6.51%QNT$203.62▲ 6.80%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.10%TAO$236.80▲ 6.79%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0522▲ 5.10%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Dancing Animals vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 78424.1× the size of Dancing Animals (AINIMALS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.26 across 60 shared trading days). AINIMALS has been the more volatile of the two, at 377% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.26
Size ratio
1 : 78424.1
Dancing AnimalsAINIMALS

$2.180e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$2,184
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
377%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.172100

24h
+1.38%
Market cap
$171.32M
Volume 24h
$31.02M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
AINIMALS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

AINIMALSWIF

  1. 7 days+25.90%-7.39%AINIMALS
  2. 30 days-6.33%-32.13%AINIMALS
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.26over 60 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricAINIMALSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-97.8%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.250.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed AINIMALS by 95.5% — measured on the AINIMALS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.