BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

degenerative SITCOM vs Shiba Inu

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is 22606.0× the size of degenerative SITCOM ($SITCOM) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.49 across 35 shared trading days). $SITCOM has been the more volatile of the two, at 85% annualised against SHIB's 69%.

Correlation
0.49
Size ratio
1 : 22606.0
degenerative SITCOM$SITCOM

$0.000118

24h
—
Market cap
$118,432
Volume 24h
$2,352
Volatility (ann.)
85%
Shiba InuSHIB

$4.550e-6

24h
-4.13%
Market cap
$2.68B
Volume 24h
$60.29M
Volatility (ann.)
69%
$SITCOM 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SHIB

Performance

$SITCOMSHIB

  1. 7 days+0.09%-4.83%$SITCOM
  2. 30 days-20.38%-19.56%SHIB
  3. 90 days—+1.07%—
  4. 1 year—-46.55%—

Correlation

0.49over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric$SITCOMSHIB
Max drawdown (400d)-33.5%-68.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.250.01
Best 30 days (past year)—+39.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-38.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: SHIB outperformed $SITCOM by 3.4% — measured on the $SITCOM/SHIB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.