divinely protected vs Cash Cat

Cash Cat (CASHCAT) is 4643.4× the size of divinely protected (222) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, CASHCAT is ahead by 3.5 percentage points (222 -40.2% against CASHCAT -36.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.04 across 23 shared trading days). CASHCAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 261% annualised against 222's 143%.

Correlation: 0.04
Size ratio: 1 : 4643.4
Ahead over 30 days: CASHCAT

divinely protected222

$1.951e-5

24h: +6.85%
Market cap: $19,510
Volume 24h: $52
Volatility (ann.): 143%

Cash CatCASHCAT

$0.091720

24h: -16.16%
Market cap: $90.59M
Volume 24h: $12.72M
Volatility (ann.): 261%

222 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% CASHCAT

Performance

222CASHCAT

7 days-9.37%+3.53%CASHCAT
30 days-40.22%-36.68%CASHCAT

Correlation

0.04over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	222	CASHCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-64.6%	-69.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.43	-0.03

Relative strength over 90 days: CASHCAT outperformed 222 by 24.5% — measured on the 222/CASHCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

divinely protected →Cash Cat →