BTC$78,554.77▲ 1.93%ETH$2,329.10▲ 2.68%USDT$0.9989▲ 0.01%BNB$703.47▲ 0.73%XRP$1.29▲ 2.41%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.54▲ 1.16%TRX$0.3218▼ 0.26%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,317.99▲ 13.36%HYPE$86.78▲ 2.85%XMR$118.70▲ 1.97%DOGE$0.0752▲ 1.49%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$75.31▲ 1.80%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%LINK$11.17▲ 0.18%ADA$0.1914▲ 1.72%XLM$0.1642▲ 1.41%BCH$276.60▼ 0.69%NEAR$4.10▲ 6.39%UNI$7.48▲ 5.30%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%RAIN$0.006207▼ 3.64%LTC$54.78▲ 1.33%CC$0.0986▲ 4.15%AVAX$8.71▲ 2.59%SUI$0.9137▲ 4.77%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.19▲ 2.97%XAUT$4,036.08▲ 3.40%HBAR$0.0706▲ 1.26%QNT$198.96▲ 0.68%USDG$1.0000▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.71%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$231.20▲ 3.50%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0512▲ 2.19%BTC$78,554.77▲ 1.93%ETH$2,329.10▲ 2.68%USDT$0.9989▲ 0.01%BNB$703.47▲ 0.73%XRP$1.29▲ 2.41%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.54▲ 1.16%TRX$0.3218▼ 0.26%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,317.99▲ 13.36%HYPE$86.78▲ 2.85%XMR$118.70▲ 1.97%DOGE$0.0752▲ 1.49%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$75.31▲ 1.80%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%LINK$11.17▲ 0.18%ADA$0.1914▲ 1.72%XLM$0.1642▲ 1.41%BCH$276.60▼ 0.69%NEAR$4.10▲ 6.39%UNI$7.48▲ 5.30%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%RAIN$0.006207▼ 3.64%LTC$54.78▲ 1.33%CC$0.0986▲ 4.15%AVAX$8.71▲ 2.59%SUI$0.9137▲ 4.77%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.19▲ 2.97%XAUT$4,036.08▲ 3.40%HBAR$0.0706▲ 1.26%QNT$198.96▲ 0.68%USDG$1.0000▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.71%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$231.20▲ 3.50%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0512▲ 2.19%

DMT-NAT vs Bellscoin

DMT-NAT (NAT) is 23.7× the size of Bellscoin (BELLS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.03 across 36 shared trading days). BELLS has been the more volatile of the two, at 113% annualised against NAT's 98%.

Correlation
-0.03
Size ratio
23.7×
DMT-NATNAT

$1.079e-7

24h
-10.20%
Market cap
$41.86M
Volume 24h
$79,537
Volatility (ann.)
98%
BellscoinBELLS

$0.028975

24h
+19.73%
Market cap
$1.77M
Volume 24h
$87,186
Volatility (ann.)
113%
NAT 95.9%Share of the two combined market caps4.1% BELLS

Performance

NATBELLS

  1. 7 days+43.19%-37.34%NAT
  2. 30 days+31.80%-56.98%NAT
  3. 90 days—-55.00%—
  4. 1 year—-87.21%—

Correlation

-0.03over 36 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNATBELLS
Max drawdown (400d)-31.3%-87.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.06-0.36

Relative strength over 90 days: NAT outperformed BELLS by 90.9% — measured on the NAT/BELLS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.