Dog Saved By Grok vs Bordrless

Dog Saved By Grok (LOOMER) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, LOOMER is ahead by 34.9 percentage points (LOOMER -64.8% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move loosely in opposite directions (correlation -0.35 across 20 shared trading days). LOOMER has been the more volatile of the two, at 1191% annualised against BORDR's 919%.

Correlation: -0.35
Ahead over 30 days: LOOMER

Dog Saved By GrokLOOMER

$2.659e-6

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $5
Volatility (ann.): 1191%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

LOOMER 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

LOOMERBORDR

7 days-23.38%-35.15%LOOMER
30 days-64.81%-99.72%LOOMER

Correlation

-0.35over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LOOMER	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-80.6%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.05	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: LOOMER outperformed BORDR by 1049.5% — measured on the LOOMER/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Dog Saved By Grok →Bordrless →