BTC$80,718.10▲ 4.08%ETH$2,438.13▲ 6.57%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$716.27▲ 2.48%XRP$1.32▲ 3.79%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.86▲ 3.72%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.83%ZEC$1,322.09▲ 10.68%HYPE$86.13▲ 0.01%DOGE$0.0775▲ 3.15%XMR$118.70▲ 2.78%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$77.87▲ 4.74%LINK$11.66▲ 5.16%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%ADA$0.1984▲ 4.65%XLM$0.1691▲ 3.22%BCH$281.10▲ 1.86%NEAR$4.18▲ 9.01%UNI$7.60▲ 4.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.05%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%LTC$56.36▲ 4.49%RAIN$0.005876▼ 6.69%AVAX$8.96▲ 5.35%CC$0.0999▲ 4.28%SUI$0.9419▲ 5.26%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.20▲ 2.35%XAUT$4,024.35▲ 2.59%HBAR$0.0730▲ 4.75%QNT$204.95▲ 5.39%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.55%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$236.90▲ 4.72%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0522▲ 2.81%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.02%BTC$80,718.10▲ 4.08%ETH$2,438.13▲ 6.57%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$716.27▲ 2.48%XRP$1.32▲ 3.79%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.86▲ 3.72%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.83%ZEC$1,322.09▲ 10.68%HYPE$86.13▲ 0.01%DOGE$0.0775▲ 3.15%XMR$118.70▲ 2.78%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$77.87▲ 4.74%LINK$11.66▲ 5.16%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%ADA$0.1984▲ 4.65%XLM$0.1691▲ 3.22%BCH$281.10▲ 1.86%NEAR$4.18▲ 9.01%UNI$7.60▲ 4.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.05%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%LTC$56.36▲ 4.49%RAIN$0.005876▼ 6.69%AVAX$8.96▲ 5.35%CC$0.0999▲ 4.28%SUI$0.9419▲ 5.26%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.20▲ 2.35%XAUT$4,024.35▲ 2.59%HBAR$0.0730▲ 4.75%QNT$204.95▲ 5.39%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.55%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$236.90▲ 4.72%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0522▲ 2.81%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.02%

Dogs vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 7.0× the size of Dogs (DOGS) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, DOGS is ahead by 31.4 percentage points (DOGS -29.6% against WIF -61.0%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.55 across 399 shared trading days). DOGS has been the more volatile of the two, at 130% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.55
Size ratio
1 : 7.0
Ahead over 1 year
DOGS
DogsDOGS

$3.253e-5

24h
-6.53%
Market cap
$25.59M
Volume 24h
$297,509
Volatility (ann.)
130%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.179900

24h
+3.78%
Market cap
$179.50M
Volume 24h
$26.93M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
DOGS 12.5%Share of the two combined market caps87.5% WIF

Performance

DOGSWIF

  1. 7 days-12.15%-4.50%WIF
  2. 30 days-33.95%-32.23%WIF
  3. 90 days-9.02%+22.16%WIF
  4. 1 year-29.64%-61.00%DOGS

Correlation

0.55over 399 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.8490d: 0.651y: 0.49

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricDOGSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-80.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.110.22
Best 30 days (past year)+210.1%+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)-54.4%-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed DOGS by 25.5% — measured on the DOGS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.