Dot.com vs Bordrless

Dot.com (BOT) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, BOT is ahead by 14.7 percentage points (BOT -85.1% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.08 across 33 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 919% annualised against BOT's 553%.

Correlation: -0.08
Ahead over 30 days: BOT

Dot.comBOT

$2.296e-5

24h: -3.65%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $226
Volatility (ann.): 553%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

BOT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

BOTBORDR

7 days-15.64%-35.15%BOT
30 days-85.07%-99.72%BOT

Correlation

-0.08over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	BOT	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-95.9%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.17	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: BOT outperformed BORDR by 387.6% — measured on the BOT/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Dot.com →Bordrless →