dots vs Bordrless

dots (DOTS) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, DOTS is ahead by 17.2 percentage points (DOTS -82.5% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.16 across 24 shared trading days). DOTS has been the more volatile of the two, at 9582% annualised against BORDR's 919%.

Correlation: 0.16
Ahead over 30 days: DOTS

dotsDOTS

$1.283e-5

24h: +5.50%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $588
Volatility (ann.): 9582%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

DOTS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

DOTSBORDR

7 days-8.13%-35.15%DOTS
30 days-82.48%-99.72%DOTS

Correlation

0.16over 24 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	DOTS	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-98.0%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.01	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: DOTS outperformed BORDR by 13771.0% — measured on the DOTS/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

dots →Bordrless →