drooling cat vs catwifhat

catwifhat ($CWIF) is 155.8× the size of drooling cat (DROOLING) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, $CWIF is ahead by 55.9 percentage points (DROOLING -98.7% against $CWIF -42.8%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.25 across 33 shared trading days). DROOLING has been the more volatile of the two, at 448% annualised against $CWIF's 131%.

Correlation: 0.25
Size ratio: 1 : 155.8
Ahead over 30 days: $CWIF

drooling catDROOLING

$0.000105

24h: +1.93%
Market cap: $104,440
Volume 24h: $6,130
Volatility (ann.): 448%

catwifhat$CWIF

$1.628e-8

24h: +3.21%
Market cap: $16.28M
Volume 24h: $307
Volatility (ann.): 131%

DROOLING 0.6%Share of the two combined market caps99.4% $CWIF

Performance

DROOLING$CWIF

7 days-98.83%-33.42%$CWIF
30 days-98.68%-42.77%$CWIF

Correlation

0.25over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	DROOLING	$CWIF
Max drawdown (400d)	-99.0%	-49.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.22	-0.33

Relative strength over 90 days: $CWIF outperformed DROOLING by 98.0% — measured on the DROOLING/$CWIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

drooling cat →catwifhat →