e/quacc vs Bordrless

e/quacc (QUACC) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, QUACC is ahead by 74.7 percentage points (QUACC -24.0% against BORDR -98.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.29 across 24 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 959% annualised against QUACC's 73%.

Correlation: 0.29
Ahead over 30 days: QUACC

e/quaccQUACC

$2.066e-6

24h: -1.71%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $1
Volatility (ann.): 73%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 959%

QUACC 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

QUACCBORDR

7 days-19.02%-16.86%BORDR
30 days-24.01%-98.75%QUACC

Correlation

0.29over 24 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	QUACC	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-33.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.33	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: QUACC outperformed BORDR by 2121.1% — measured on the QUACC/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

e/quacc →Bordrless →