e/quacc vs FLOAT
e/quacc (QUACC) and FLOAT (FLOAT) compared side by side. FLOAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 2474672% annualised against QUACC's 73%.
e/quacc (QUACC) and FLOAT (FLOAT) compared side by side. FLOAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 2474672% annualised against QUACC's 73%.
QUACCFLOAT
| Metric | QUACC | FLOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -33.8% | -100.0% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.33 | 0.17 |
Relative strength over 90 days: FLOAT outperformed QUACC by 100.0% — measured on the QUACC/FLOAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.