BTC$75,922.32▼ 5.97%ETH$2,235.36▼ 8.15%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$693.47▼ 3.23%XRP$1.21▼ 8.09%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.87▼ 7.14%TRX$0.3187▼ 0.36%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.02%ZEC$1,283.88▼ 2.30%HYPE$77.16▼ 8.00%XMR$118.70▼ 2.33%DOGE$0.0718▼ 7.22%USDS$1.00▼ 0.00%WBT$72.94▼ 6.60%LEO$9.35▼ 0.06%LINK$10.86▼ 6.52%ADA$0.1839▼ 7.62%BCH$275.40▼ 2.47%XLM$0.1548▼ 8.13%NEAR$3.68▼ 9.12%USDE$1.00▼ 0.07%DAI$1.00▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.006100▲ 2.00%UNI$6.97▼ 10.66%LTC$52.42▼ 7.05%CC$0.0970▼ 4.93%AVAX$8.27▼ 6.07%USD1$0.9992▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8588▼ 8.07%XAUT$4,032.64▼ 2.17%GRAM$1.10▼ 5.05%HBAR$0.0684▼ 6.77%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$189.60▼ 8.33%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.81%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.40▼ 7.47%CRO$0.0492▼ 6.13%BTC$75,922.32▼ 5.97%ETH$2,235.36▼ 8.15%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$693.47▼ 3.23%XRP$1.21▼ 8.09%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.87▼ 7.14%TRX$0.3187▼ 0.36%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.02%ZEC$1,283.88▼ 2.30%HYPE$77.16▼ 8.00%XMR$118.70▼ 2.33%DOGE$0.0718▼ 7.22%USDS$1.00▼ 0.00%WBT$72.94▼ 6.60%LEO$9.35▼ 0.06%LINK$10.86▼ 6.52%ADA$0.1839▼ 7.62%BCH$275.40▼ 2.47%XLM$0.1548▼ 8.13%NEAR$3.68▼ 9.12%USDE$1.00▼ 0.07%DAI$1.00▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.006100▲ 2.00%UNI$6.97▼ 10.66%LTC$52.42▼ 7.05%CC$0.0970▼ 4.93%AVAX$8.27▼ 6.07%USD1$0.9992▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8588▼ 8.07%XAUT$4,032.64▼ 2.17%GRAM$1.10▼ 5.05%HBAR$0.0684▼ 6.77%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$189.60▼ 8.33%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.81%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.40▼ 7.47%CRO$0.0492▼ 6.13%

Ember vs Virtuals Protocol

Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) is 10515.5× the size of Ember (EMBER) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.58 across 27 shared trading days). VIRTUAL has been the more volatile of the two, at 119% annualised against EMBER's 58%.

Correlation
0.58
Size ratio
1 : 10515.5
EmberEMBER

$3.914e-7

24h
—
Market cap
$35,734
Volume 24h
$13
Volatility (ann.)
58%
Virtuals ProtocolVIRTUAL

$0.571800

24h
-5.63%
Market cap
$375.76M
Volume 24h
$38.91M
Volatility (ann.)
119%
EMBER 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% VIRTUAL

Performance

EMBERVIRTUAL

  1. 7 days-3.57%-1.02%VIRTUAL
  2. 30 days-17.75%-30.18%EMBER
  3. 90 days—+0.07%—
  4. 1 year—-59.52%—

Correlation

0.58over 27 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricEMBERVIRTUAL
Max drawdown (400d)-19.9%-71.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.310.00
Best 30 days (past year)—+47.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-54.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: EMBER outperformed VIRTUAL by 14.9% — measured on the EMBER/VIRTUAL ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.