enu vs Bordrless

enu (ENU) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, ENU is ahead by 55.5 percentage points (ENU -44.2% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.12 across 21 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 919% annualised against ENU's 321%.

Correlation: 0.12
Ahead over 30 days: ENU

enuENU

$1.960e-6

24h: +0.68%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $3
Volatility (ann.): 321%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

ENU 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

ENUBORDR

7 days+13.49%-35.15%ENU
30 days-44.21%-99.72%ENU

Correlation

0.12over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	ENU	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-57.2%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.14	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: ENU outperformed BORDR by 2443.3% — measured on the ENU/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

enu →Bordrless →