EQ9 vs BNB

EQ9 (EQ9) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.26 across 22 shared trading days). EQ9 has been the more volatile of the two, at 119% annualised against BNB's 51%.

Correlation: 0.26

EQ9EQ9

$0.000315

24h: +1.27%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $52
Volatility (ann.): 119%

BNBBNB

$708.1500

24h: +0.92%
Market cap: $92.74B
Volume 24h: $955.90M
Volatility (ann.): 51%

EQ9 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

EQ9BNB

7 days-3.52%-6.28%EQ9
30 days—-12.23%—
90 days—+17.56%—
1 year—-29.73%—

Correlation

0.26over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	EQ9	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-14.6%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.03	0.45
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: EQ9 outperformed BNB by 13.3% — measured on the EQ9/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

EQ9 →BNB →