BTC$80,816.10▲ 0.24%ETH$2,344.04▼ 0.07%USDT$0.9992▲ 0.01%BNB$748.76▼ 0.09%XRP$1.32▼ 0.00%USDC$1.00▼ 0.00%SOL$101.51▲ 0.72%TRX$0.3299▲ 0.41%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.16%ZEC$1,281.97▼ 1.06%HYPE$80.48▼ 0.59%DOGE$0.0791▲ 1.39%XMR$118.70▲ 0.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.03%WBT$77.50▲ 0.17%LINK$11.57▲ 0.93%LEO$9.40▲ 4.05%ADA$0.2022▼ 1.01%NEAR$4.61▼ 0.13%XLM$0.1702▲ 0.49%BCH$283.20▼ 2.50%RAIN$0.006985▼ 3.04%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$58.18▲ 2.99%DAI$0.9999▼ 0.03%UNI$7.10▲ 0.11%CC$0.1001▲ 1.22%AVAX$8.85▲ 0.10%USD1$1.00▲ 0.03%SUI$0.9258▲ 0.72%GRAM$1.24▲ 1.44%HBAR$0.0747▼ 1.33%XAUT$4,031.44▼ 0.59%USDG$0.9999▼ 0.01%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%TAO$253.10▲ 0.82%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.18%QNT$194.09▼ 2.23%CRO$0.0532▲ 0.55%ENA$0.1986▼ 4.66%BTC$80,816.10▲ 0.24%ETH$2,344.04▼ 0.07%USDT$0.9992▲ 0.01%BNB$748.76▼ 0.09%XRP$1.32▼ 0.00%USDC$1.00▼ 0.00%SOL$101.51▲ 0.72%TRX$0.3299▲ 0.41%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.16%ZEC$1,281.97▼ 1.06%HYPE$80.48▼ 0.59%DOGE$0.0791▲ 1.39%XMR$118.70▲ 0.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.03%WBT$77.50▲ 0.17%LINK$11.57▲ 0.93%LEO$9.40▲ 4.05%ADA$0.2022▼ 1.01%NEAR$4.61▼ 0.13%XLM$0.1702▲ 0.49%BCH$283.20▼ 2.50%RAIN$0.006985▼ 3.04%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$58.18▲ 2.99%DAI$0.9999▼ 0.03%UNI$7.10▲ 0.11%CC$0.1001▲ 1.22%AVAX$8.85▲ 0.10%USD1$1.00▲ 0.03%SUI$0.9258▲ 0.72%GRAM$1.24▲ 1.44%HBAR$0.0747▼ 1.33%XAUT$4,031.44▼ 0.59%USDG$0.9999▼ 0.01%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%TAO$253.10▲ 0.82%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.18%QNT$194.09▼ 2.23%CRO$0.0532▲ 0.55%ENA$0.1986▼ 4.66%

Feels Good Man vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 175.8× the size of Feels Good Man (FEELSGOOD) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.16 across 28 shared trading days). FEELSGOOD has been the more volatile of the two, at 478% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.16
Size ratio
1 : 175.8
Feels Good ManFEELSGOOD

$0.001027

24h
+31.13%
Market cap
$1.02M
Volume 24h
$742
Volatility (ann.)
478%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.180300

24h
+0.64%
Market cap
$180.11M
Volume 24h
$43.97M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
FEELSGOOD 0.6%Share of the two combined market caps99.4% WIF

Performance

FEELSGOODWIF

  1. 7 days+89.64%-12.45%FEELSGOOD
  2. 30 days-30.64%-26.34%WIF
  3. 90 days—+24.81%—
  4. 1 year—-67.37%—

Correlation

0.16over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricFEELSGOODWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-72.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.060.25
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed FEELSGOOD by 4.1% — measured on the FEELSGOOD/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.