BTC$76,221.00▼ 5.68%ETH$2,241.40▼ 7.74%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.03%BNB$694.30▼ 3.50%XRP$1.22▼ 6.89%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.29▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3188▼ 0.41%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.28%ZEC$1,313.48▲ 0.76%HYPE$77.76▼ 7.62%XMR$118.70▼ 2.83%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.53%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$73.04▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▼ 0.09%LINK$10.86▼ 5.10%ADA$0.1851▼ 6.29%BCH$275.60▼ 2.79%XLM$0.1549▼ 8.05%NEAR$3.73▼ 7.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.07%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006213▲ 3.74%UNI$6.97▼ 9.24%LTC$52.41▼ 6.99%CC$0.0955▼ 4.62%AVAX$8.28▼ 5.49%USD1$0.9996▼ 0.01%SUI$0.8614▼ 7.64%XAUT$4,054.79▼ 1.13%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.36%HBAR$0.0686▼ 5.69%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$191.41▼ 5.98%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.28%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.40▼ 6.81%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.96%BTC$76,221.00▼ 5.68%ETH$2,241.40▼ 7.74%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.03%BNB$694.30▼ 3.50%XRP$1.22▼ 6.89%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.29▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3188▼ 0.41%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.28%ZEC$1,313.48▲ 0.76%HYPE$77.76▼ 7.62%XMR$118.70▼ 2.83%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.53%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$73.04▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▼ 0.09%LINK$10.86▼ 5.10%ADA$0.1851▼ 6.29%BCH$275.60▼ 2.79%XLM$0.1549▼ 8.05%NEAR$3.73▼ 7.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.07%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006213▲ 3.74%UNI$6.97▼ 9.24%LTC$52.41▼ 6.99%CC$0.0955▼ 4.62%AVAX$8.28▼ 5.49%USD1$0.9996▼ 0.01%SUI$0.8614▼ 7.64%XAUT$4,054.79▼ 1.13%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.36%HBAR$0.0686▼ 5.69%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$191.41▼ 5.98%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.28%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.40▼ 6.81%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.96%

FlokiFork vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 7036.3× the size of FlokiFork (FORK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.33 across 189 shared trading days). FORK has been the more volatile of the two, at 137% annualised against WIF's 105%.

Correlation
0.33
Size ratio
1 : 7036.3
FlokiForkFORK

$2.432e-9

24h
+8.00%
Market cap
$23,283
Volume 24h
$5
Volatility (ann.)
137%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164400

24h
-4.34%
Market cap
$163.83M
Volume 24h
$31.95M
Volatility (ann.)
105%
FORK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

FORKWIF

  1. 7 days-10.98%-2.82%WIF
  2. 30 days-12.97%-34.09%FORK
  3. 90 days-17.75%+17.59%WIF
  4. 1 year—-62.97%—

Correlation

0.33over 189 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6490d: 0.281y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricFORKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-64.3%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.110.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed FORK by 11.0% — measured on the FORK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.