BTC$80,439.14▲ 3.61%ETH$2,427.88▲ 5.79%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$716.32▲ 2.90%XRP$1.31▲ 2.18%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.99▲ 2.77%TRX$0.3205▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.20%ZEC$1,304.11▲ 7.44%HYPE$84.75▼ 1.81%DOGE$0.0769▲ 2.09%XMR$118.70▲ 0.72%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.91▲ 4.33%LINK$11.55▲ 3.95%LEO$9.33▲ 0.65%ADA$0.1971▲ 3.87%XLM$0.1675▲ 2.32%BCH$282.20▲ 2.21%NEAR$4.09▲ 7.01%UNI$7.63▲ 4.83%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.94▲ 3.02%RAIN$0.006065▼ 3.22%AVAX$8.87▲ 3.98%CC$0.0982▲ 2.81%SUI$0.9351▲ 4.37%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%GRAM$1.18▲ 0.79%XAUT$4,050.82▲ 3.26%HBAR$0.0723▲ 4.04%QNT$202.96▲ 3.94%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.50%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$235.80▲ 4.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0518▲ 1.88%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%BTC$80,439.14▲ 3.61%ETH$2,427.88▲ 5.79%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$716.32▲ 2.90%XRP$1.31▲ 2.18%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.99▲ 2.77%TRX$0.3205▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.20%ZEC$1,304.11▲ 7.44%HYPE$84.75▼ 1.81%DOGE$0.0769▲ 2.09%XMR$118.70▲ 0.72%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.91▲ 4.33%LINK$11.55▲ 3.95%LEO$9.33▲ 0.65%ADA$0.1971▲ 3.87%XLM$0.1675▲ 2.32%BCH$282.20▲ 2.21%NEAR$4.09▲ 7.01%UNI$7.63▲ 4.83%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.94▲ 3.02%RAIN$0.006065▼ 3.22%AVAX$8.87▲ 3.98%CC$0.0982▲ 2.81%SUI$0.9351▲ 4.37%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%GRAM$1.18▲ 0.79%XAUT$4,050.82▲ 3.26%HBAR$0.0723▲ 4.04%QNT$202.96▲ 3.94%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.50%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%TAO$235.80▲ 4.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0518▲ 1.88%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%

Flying Tulip vs GMX

GMX (GMX) is 1.7× the size of Flying Tulip (FT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.03 across 54 shared trading days). FT has been the more volatile of the two, at 116% annualised against GMX's 75%.

Correlation
0.03
Size ratio
1 : 1.7
Flying TulipFT

$0.115174

24h
+3.14%
Market cap
$56.02M
Volume 24h
$74,422
Volatility (ann.)
116%
GMXGMX

$9.0800

24h
+4.90%
Market cap
$97.02M
Volume 24h
$4.56M
Volatility (ann.)
75%
FT 36.6%Share of the two combined market caps63.4% GMX

Performance

FTGMX

  1. 7 days-10.62%-1.15%GMX
  2. 30 days+10.23%+2.13%FT
  3. 90 days—+36.83%—
  4. 1 year—-2.82%—

Correlation

0.03over 54 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricFTGMX
Max drawdown (400d)-26.2%-66.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.110.51
Best 30 days (past year)—+32.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-34.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: GMX outperformed FT by 8.4% — measured on the FT/GMX ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.