Fomoween vs Bordrless

Fomoween (FOMOWEEN) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, FOMOWEEN is ahead by 90.0 percentage points (FOMOWEEN -9.7% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.25 across 28 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 919% annualised against FOMOWEEN's 191%.

Correlation: -0.25
Ahead over 30 days: FOMOWEEN

FomoweenFOMOWEEN

$1.935e-6

24h: -2.44%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $5
Volatility (ann.): 191%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

FOMOWEEN 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

FOMOWEENBORDR

7 days-14.85%-35.15%FOMOWEEN
30 days-9.68%-99.72%FOMOWEEN

Correlation

-0.25over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	FOMOWEEN	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-36.0%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.09	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: FOMOWEEN outperformed BORDR by 1910.4% — measured on the FOMOWEEN/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Fomoween →Bordrless →