Force (FRC) and GMT (GMT) compared side by side. Over the past 1 year, FRC is ahead by 89.7 percentage points (FRC +18.4% against GMT -71.3%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.03 across 363 shared trading days). GMT has been the more volatile of the two, at 89% annualised against FRC's 21%.
FRCGMT
0.03over 363 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | FRC | GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -10.8% | -85.5% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.56 | -0.04 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +44.5% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -44.6% |
Relative strength over 90 days: GMT outperformed FRC by 8.1% — measured on the FRC/GMT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.