BTC$77,197.01▼ 4.70%ETH$2,290.34▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$694.76▼ 3.70%XRP$1.26▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.00▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,241.98▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.10▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0728▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.91▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1861▼ 7.29%BCH$281.60▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1573▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.78▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.02▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.11▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.39▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8671▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,093.49▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0688▼ 7.28%QNT$195.25▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$221.40▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%BTC$77,197.01▼ 4.70%ETH$2,290.34▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$694.76▼ 3.70%XRP$1.26▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.00▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,241.98▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.10▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0728▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.91▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1861▼ 7.29%BCH$281.60▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1573▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.78▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.02▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.11▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.39▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8671▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,093.49▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0688▼ 7.28%QNT$195.25▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$221.40▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%

Get Rich or Die Trying vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 22297.3× the size of Get Rich or Die Trying (GRODT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.48 across 29 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against GRODT's 52%.

Correlation
0.48
Size ratio
1 : 22297.3
Get Rich or Die TryingGRODT

$7.380e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$7,377
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
52%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.165900

24h
-9.29%
Market cap
$164.49M
Volume 24h
$28.27M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
GRODT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

GRODTWIF

  1. 7 days-8.23%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-29.52%-32.13%GRODT
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.48over 29 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricGRODTWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-29.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.570.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: GRODT outperformed WIF by 3.0% — measured on the GRODT/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.