BTC$80,498.97▲ 2.84%ETH$2,420.24▲ 4.31%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.06%BNB$715.04▲ 1.86%XRP$1.32▲ 3.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.59▲ 3.76%TRX$0.3184▼ 1.12%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,317.12▲ 2.63%HYPE$83.75▼ 2.73%DOGE$0.0770▲ 2.32%XMR$118.70▼ 0.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.83▲ 3.23%LINK$11.61▲ 3.86%LEO$9.35▲ 0.42%ADA$0.1990▲ 3.78%XLM$0.1674▲ 2.13%BCH$289.70▲ 4.32%NEAR$4.03▼ 0.56%UNI$7.63▲ 2.07%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.16▲ 2.84%RAIN$0.006110▼ 1.89%CC$0.1028▲ 3.39%AVAX$8.77▲ 1.26%SUI$0.9290▲ 1.52%USD1$0.9990▼ 0.00%GRAM$1.17▼ 1.14%XAUT$4,107.17▲ 2.10%HBAR$0.0732▲ 3.45%QNT$205.44▲ 5.95%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.37%TAO$236.10▲ 2.19%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0524▲ 2.28%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,498.97▲ 2.84%ETH$2,420.24▲ 4.31%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.06%BNB$715.04▲ 1.86%XRP$1.32▲ 3.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.59▲ 3.76%TRX$0.3184▼ 1.12%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,317.12▲ 2.63%HYPE$83.75▼ 2.73%DOGE$0.0770▲ 2.32%XMR$118.70▼ 0.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.83▲ 3.23%LINK$11.61▲ 3.86%LEO$9.35▲ 0.42%ADA$0.1990▲ 3.78%XLM$0.1674▲ 2.13%BCH$289.70▲ 4.32%NEAR$4.03▼ 0.56%UNI$7.63▲ 2.07%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.16▲ 2.84%RAIN$0.006110▼ 1.89%CC$0.1028▲ 3.39%AVAX$8.77▲ 1.26%SUI$0.9290▲ 1.52%USD1$0.9990▼ 0.00%GRAM$1.17▼ 1.14%XAUT$4,107.17▲ 2.10%HBAR$0.0732▲ 3.45%QNT$205.44▲ 5.95%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.37%TAO$236.10▲ 2.19%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0524▲ 2.28%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

GLHFStrategy vs Blur

Blur (BLUR) is 244.1× the size of GLHFStrategy (GLHFSTR) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.15 across 189 shared trading days). GLHFSTR has been the more volatile of the two, at 140% annualised against BLUR's 114%.

Correlation
0.15
Size ratio
1 : 244.1
GLHFStrategyGLHFSTR

$0.000116

24h
—
Market cap
$100,634
Volume 24h
$102
Volatility (ann.)
140%
BlurBLUR

$0.007490

24h
+8.57%
Market cap
$24.57M
Volume 24h
$41.55M
Volatility (ann.)
114%
GLHFSTR 0.4%Share of the two combined market caps99.6% BLUR

Performance

GLHFSTRBLUR

  1. 7 days-44.78%-8.43%BLUR
  2. 30 days-30.59%-63.98%GLHFSTR
  3. 90 days-51.81%-44.61%BLUR
  4. 1 year—-81.61%—

Correlation

0.15over 189 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1290d: 0.151y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricGLHFSTRBLUR
Max drawdown (400d)-74.8%-90.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.43-0.41
Best 30 days (past year)—+78.9%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-65.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: GLHFSTR outperformed BLUR by 71.7% — measured on the GLHFSTR/BLUR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.