Gooner Processing Unit vs Bordrless

Gooner Processing Unit (GPU) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, GPU is ahead by 114.5 percentage points (GPU +15.0% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.13 across 25 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against GPU's 770%.

Correlation: -0.13
Ahead over 30 days: GPU

Gooner Processing UnitGPU

$3.513e-6

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $70
Volatility (ann.): 770%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

GPU 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

GPUBORDR

7 days+13.99%-10.80%GPU
30 days+15.00%-99.45%GPU

Correlation

-0.13over 25 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	GPU	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-72.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.02	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: GPU outperformed BORDR by 3366.0% — measured on the GPU/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Gooner Processing Unit →Bordrless →