Dogs (DOGS) is 562.5× the size of Gramming (GRAMMING) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.20 across 30 shared trading days). GRAMMING has been the more volatile of the two, at 202% annualised against DOGS's 130%.
GRAMMINGDOGS
0.20over 30 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | GRAMMING | DOGS |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -54.3% | -80.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.25 | -0.12 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +210.1% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -54.4% |
Relative strength over 90 days: DOGS outperformed GRAMMING by 25.3% — measured on the GRAMMING/DOGS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.