BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

Greenland Shark vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 15590.1× the size of Greenland Shark (SHARK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.43 across 34 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against SHARK's 60%.

Correlation
0.43
Size ratio
1 : 15590.1
Greenland SharkSHARK

$1.050e-5

24h
+5.43%
Market cap
$10,481
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
60%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163700

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
SHARK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

SHARKWIF

  1. 7 days-9.99%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-32.52%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.43over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricSHARKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-35.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.540.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed SHARK by 1.0% — measured on the SHARK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.