Grokbook vs GREEN MORNING

Grokbook (GROKBOOK) and GREEN MORNING (GM) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, GROKBOOK is ahead by 41.6 percentage points (GROKBOOK -58.2% against GM -99.8%). Their daily returns move loosely in opposite directions (correlation -0.50 across 31 shared trading days). GM has been the more volatile of the two, at 548472% annualised against GROKBOOK's 143%.

Correlation: -0.50
Ahead over 30 days: GROKBOOK

GrokbookGROKBOOK

$2.900e-6

24h: +0.53%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $9
Volatility (ann.): 143%

GREEN MORNINGGM

$0.003109

24h: +14.73%
Market cap: $3.11M
Volume 24h: $1.87M
Volatility (ann.): 548472%

GROKBOOK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% GM

Performance

GROKBOOKGM

7 days-14.04%+13.87%GM
30 days-58.19%-99.79%GROKBOOK

Correlation

-0.50over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.5090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	GROKBOOK	GM
Max drawdown (400d)	-60.5%	-100.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.41	0.00

Relative strength over 90 days: GM outperformed GROKBOOK by 99.8% — measured on the GROKBOOK/GM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Grokbook →GREEN MORNING →