BTC$80,845.86▲ 4.24%ETH$2,438.69▲ 6.24%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$719.36▲ 2.87%XRP$1.33▲ 4.65%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$97.58▲ 4.40%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.83%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.80%ZEC$1,338.37▲ 12.42%HYPE$87.79▲ 1.40%DOGE$0.0780▲ 3.65%XMR$118.70▲ 3.37%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.57▲ 4.23%LINK$11.71▲ 4.93%LEO$9.33▲ 0.51%ADA$0.2007▲ 5.01%XLM$0.1701▲ 3.48%BCH$284.60▲ 2.46%NEAR$4.23▲ 10.45%UNI$7.68▲ 4.93%USDE$1.00▲ 0.04%DAI$0.9999▼ 0.01%LTC$56.85▲ 4.50%RAIN$0.006169▼ 4.16%CC$0.1008▲ 4.80%AVAX$9.07▲ 5.88%SUI$0.9489▲ 6.37%USD1$0.9993▲ 0.06%GRAM$1.20▲ 2.63%HBAR$0.0738▲ 5.34%XAUT$4,020.22▲ 2.42%QNT$209.48▲ 7.48%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.07%TAO$239.40▲ 5.57%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 3.02%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%BTC$80,845.86▲ 4.24%ETH$2,438.69▲ 6.24%USDT$0.9991▲ 0.04%BNB$719.36▲ 2.87%XRP$1.33▲ 4.65%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$97.58▲ 4.40%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.83%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.80%ZEC$1,338.37▲ 12.42%HYPE$87.79▲ 1.40%DOGE$0.0780▲ 3.65%XMR$118.70▲ 3.37%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.57▲ 4.23%LINK$11.71▲ 4.93%LEO$9.33▲ 0.51%ADA$0.2007▲ 5.01%XLM$0.1701▲ 3.48%BCH$284.60▲ 2.46%NEAR$4.23▲ 10.45%UNI$7.68▲ 4.93%USDE$1.00▲ 0.04%DAI$0.9999▼ 0.01%LTC$56.85▲ 4.50%RAIN$0.006169▼ 4.16%CC$0.1008▲ 4.80%AVAX$9.07▲ 5.88%SUI$0.9489▲ 6.37%USD1$0.9993▲ 0.06%GRAM$1.20▲ 2.63%HBAR$0.0738▲ 5.34%XAUT$4,020.22▲ 2.42%QNT$209.48▲ 7.48%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.07%TAO$239.40▲ 5.57%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 3.02%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%

Hamilton Lane Senior Credit Opportunities Securitize Fund vs Stellar

Stellar (XLM) is 1594.1× the size of Hamilton Lane Senior Credit Opportunities Securitize Fund (HLSCOPE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.26 across 31 shared trading days). XLM has been the more volatile of the two, at 78% annualised against HLSCOPE's 2%.

Correlation
-0.26
Size ratio
1 : 1594.1
Hamilton Lane Senior Credit Opportunities Securitize FundHLSCOPE

$1,272.55

24h
+0.03%
Market cap
$3.77M
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
2%
StellarXLM

$0.170100

24h
+3.48%
Market cap
$6.02B
Volume 24h
$154.01M
Volatility (ann.)
78%
HLSCOPE 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% XLM

Performance

HLSCOPEXLM

  1. 7 days+0.00%-4.81%HLSCOPE
  2. 30 days+0.24%-27.58%HLSCOPE
  3. 90 days—-1.64%—
  4. 1 year—-41.66%—

Correlation

-0.26over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHLSCOPEXLM
Max drawdown (400d)-0.3%-64.9%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.13-0.02
Best 30 days (past year)—+63.3%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-39.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: XLM outperformed HLSCOPE by 21.3% — measured on the HLSCOPE/XLM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.