BTC$78,616.02▲ 2.01%ETH$2,330.18▲ 2.70%USDT$0.9988▲ 0.01%BNB$703.30▲ 0.69%XRP$1.29▲ 2.57%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.59▲ 1.23%TRX$0.3214▼ 0.28%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,320.03▲ 13.81%HYPE$86.99▲ 2.99%XMR$118.70▲ 1.31%DOGE$0.0753▲ 1.38%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$75.45▲ 1.94%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%LINK$11.18▲ 0.44%ADA$0.1914▲ 1.58%XLM$0.1647▲ 1.47%BCH$276.40▼ 0.24%NEAR$4.11▲ 6.58%UNI$7.45▲ 4.92%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%RAIN$0.006229▼ 1.81%LTC$54.86▲ 1.19%CC$0.0988▲ 4.09%AVAX$8.73▲ 2.62%SUI$0.9165▲ 4.64%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.02%GRAM$1.19▲ 2.83%XAUT$4,036.35▲ 3.51%HBAR$0.0706▲ 1.28%QNT$199.52▲ 0.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.43%TAO$231.50▲ 3.45%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0512▲ 2.13%BTC$78,616.02▲ 2.01%ETH$2,330.18▲ 2.70%USDT$0.9988▲ 0.01%BNB$703.30▲ 0.69%XRP$1.29▲ 2.57%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.59▲ 1.23%TRX$0.3214▼ 0.28%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,320.03▲ 13.81%HYPE$86.99▲ 2.99%XMR$118.70▲ 1.31%DOGE$0.0753▲ 1.38%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$75.45▲ 1.94%LEO$9.32▲ 0.46%LINK$11.18▲ 0.44%ADA$0.1914▲ 1.58%XLM$0.1647▲ 1.47%BCH$276.40▼ 0.24%NEAR$4.11▲ 6.58%UNI$7.45▲ 4.92%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%RAIN$0.006229▼ 1.81%LTC$54.86▲ 1.19%CC$0.0988▲ 4.09%AVAX$8.73▲ 2.62%SUI$0.9165▲ 4.64%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.02%GRAM$1.19▲ 2.83%XAUT$4,036.35▲ 3.51%HBAR$0.0706▲ 1.28%QNT$199.52▲ 0.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.43%TAO$231.50▲ 3.45%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0512▲ 2.13%

Harold vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 13.2× the size of Harold (HAROLD) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.44 across 34 shared trading days). HAROLD has been the more volatile of the two, at 513% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.44
Size ratio
1 : 13.2
HaroldHAROLD

$0.013340

24h
+0.03%
Market cap
$13.34M
Volume 24h
$3,313
Volatility (ann.)
513%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.176800

24h
+4.21%
Market cap
$175.91M
Volume 24h
$24.92M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
HAROLD 7.0%Share of the two combined market caps93.0% WIF

Performance

HAROLDWIF

  1. 7 days-99.97%-4.50%WIF
  2. 30 days-99.84%-32.23%WIF
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.44over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHAROLDWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-100.0%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.190.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed HAROLD by 99.8% — measured on the HAROLD/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.