BTC$80,688.62▲ 4.25%ETH$2,427.78▲ 6.66%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$720.87▲ 3.39%XRP$1.31▲ 2.40%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.73▲ 3.12%TRX$0.3195▼ 0.62%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 0.62%ZEC$1,299.06▲ 6.97%HYPE$84.38▼ 0.95%DOGE$0.0771▲ 2.58%XMR$118.70▲ 1.42%USDS$1.00▲ 0.06%WBT$77.97▲ 4.92%LINK$11.46▲ 3.87%LEO$9.32▲ 0.26%ADA$0.1970▲ 3.84%XLM$0.1682▲ 3.68%BCH$282.30▲ 2.57%NEAR$4.00▲ 4.04%UNI$7.69▲ 6.10%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.32▲ 3.89%RAIN$0.005972▼ 9.49%CC$0.0992▲ 2.68%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.55%SUI$0.9307▲ 4.00%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.07%GRAM$1.17▼ 0.06%XAUT$4,056.18▲ 2.98%HBAR$0.0730▲ 4.83%QNT$203.15▲ 5.64%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.56%TAO$234.00▲ 3.57%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%CRO$0.0519▲ 3.57%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%BTC$80,688.62▲ 4.25%ETH$2,427.78▲ 6.66%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$720.87▲ 3.39%XRP$1.31▲ 2.40%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.73▲ 3.12%TRX$0.3195▼ 0.62%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 0.62%ZEC$1,299.06▲ 6.97%HYPE$84.38▼ 0.95%DOGE$0.0771▲ 2.58%XMR$118.70▲ 1.42%USDS$1.00▲ 0.06%WBT$77.97▲ 4.92%LINK$11.46▲ 3.87%LEO$9.32▲ 0.26%ADA$0.1970▲ 3.84%XLM$0.1682▲ 3.68%BCH$282.30▲ 2.57%NEAR$4.00▲ 4.04%UNI$7.69▲ 6.10%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.32▲ 3.89%RAIN$0.005972▼ 9.49%CC$0.0992▲ 2.68%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.55%SUI$0.9307▲ 4.00%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.07%GRAM$1.17▼ 0.06%XAUT$4,056.18▲ 2.98%HBAR$0.0730▲ 4.83%QNT$203.15▲ 5.64%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.56%TAO$234.00▲ 3.57%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%CRO$0.0519▲ 3.57%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%

Provenance Blockchain vs Stellar

Stellar (XLM) is 15.9× the size of Provenance Blockchain (HASH) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.01 across 58 shared trading days). HASH has been the more volatile of the two, at 160% annualised against XLM's 78%.

Correlation
-0.01
Size ratio
1 : 15.9
Provenance BlockchainHASH

$0.006228

24h
-0.69%
Market cap
$372.60M
Volume 24h
$2,058
Volatility (ann.)
160%
StellarXLM

$0.168200

24h
+3.68%
Market cap
$5.93B
Volume 24h
$174.11M
Volatility (ann.)
78%
HASH 5.9%Share of the two combined market caps94.1% XLM

Performance

HASHXLM

  1. 7 days-15.08%-2.61%XLM
  2. 30 days-22.75%-22.09%XLM
  3. 90 days—+4.03%—
  4. 1 year—-37.70%—

Correlation

-0.01over 58 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHASHXLM
Max drawdown (400d)-30.9%-64.9%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.100.06
Best 30 days (past year)—+63.3%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-39.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: XLM outperformed HASH by 19.0% — measured on the HASH/XLM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.