BTC$80,683.67▼ 0.18%ETH$2,338.27▼ 0.82%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.00%BNB$748.39▼ 0.46%XRP$1.32▼ 0.66%USDC$1.00▼ 0.00%SOL$101.25▼ 0.08%TRX$0.3301▲ 0.56%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.16%ZEC$1,276.90▼ 3.07%HYPE$80.14▼ 0.94%DOGE$0.0790▲ 0.50%XMR$118.70▲ 0.50%USDS$1.00▼ 0.03%WBT$77.27▼ 0.35%LINK$11.52▼ 0.17%LEO$9.40▲ 4.44%ADA$0.2020▼ 2.11%NEAR$4.60▼ 0.83%XLM$0.1698▼ 0.08%BCH$285.60▼ 2.58%RAIN$0.006945▼ 3.65%LTC$58.67▲ 3.49%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.06▼ 1.44%CC$0.0999▲ 0.78%AVAX$8.85▼ 0.33%USD1$1.00▲ 0.00%SUI$0.9244▼ 0.39%GRAM$1.23▲ 0.79%HBAR$0.0750▼ 1.77%XAUT$4,038.54▼ 0.54%USDG$0.9998▼ 0.01%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.03%TAO$252.20▼ 0.24%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.42%QNT$194.69▼ 2.84%CRO$0.0530▲ 0.29%ENA$0.1969▼ 7.34%BTC$80,683.67▼ 0.18%ETH$2,338.27▼ 0.82%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.00%BNB$748.39▼ 0.46%XRP$1.32▼ 0.66%USDC$1.00▼ 0.00%SOL$101.25▼ 0.08%TRX$0.3301▲ 0.56%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.16%ZEC$1,276.90▼ 3.07%HYPE$80.14▼ 0.94%DOGE$0.0790▲ 0.50%XMR$118.70▲ 0.50%USDS$1.00▼ 0.03%WBT$77.27▼ 0.35%LINK$11.52▼ 0.17%LEO$9.40▲ 4.44%ADA$0.2020▼ 2.11%NEAR$4.60▼ 0.83%XLM$0.1698▼ 0.08%BCH$285.60▼ 2.58%RAIN$0.006945▼ 3.65%LTC$58.67▲ 3.49%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.06▼ 1.44%CC$0.0999▲ 0.78%AVAX$8.85▼ 0.33%USD1$1.00▲ 0.00%SUI$0.9244▼ 0.39%GRAM$1.23▲ 0.79%HBAR$0.0750▼ 1.77%XAUT$4,038.54▼ 0.54%USDG$0.9998▼ 0.01%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.03%TAO$252.20▼ 0.24%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.42%QNT$194.69▼ 2.84%CRO$0.0530▲ 0.29%ENA$0.1969▼ 7.34%

HASHCATS vs BNB

BNB (BNB) is 1146351.3× the size of HASHCATS (HASH) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.69 across 27 shared trading days). HASH has been the more volatile of the two, at 297% annualised against BNB's 51%.

Correlation
0.69
Size ratio
1 : 1146351.3
HASHCATSHASH

$0.041092

24h
+0.28%
Market cap
$85,703
Volume 24h
$242
Volatility (ann.)
297%
BNBBNB

$748.3900

24h
-0.46%
Market cap
$98.25B
Volume 24h
$877.10M
Volatility (ann.)
51%
HASH 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

HASHBNB

  1. 7 days-20.22%+0.44%BNB
  2. 30 days+12.34%-4.36%HASH
  3. 90 days—+30.24%—
  4. 1 year—-34.59%—

Correlation

0.69over 27 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHASHBNB
Max drawdown (400d)-56.7%-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.040.84
Best 30 days (past year)—+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: HASH outperformed BNB by 16.4% — measured on the HASH/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.