Haunted House vs Bordrless

Haunted House (HAUNTED) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, HAUNTED is ahead by 71.0 percentage points (HAUNTED -28.7% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.10 across 29 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 919% annualised against HAUNTED's 202%.

Correlation: -0.10
Ahead over 30 days: HAUNTED

Haunted HouseHAUNTED

$1.973e-6

24h: +0.85%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $2
Volatility (ann.): 202%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

HAUNTED 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

HAUNTEDBORDR

7 days-3.51%-35.15%HAUNTED
30 days-28.67%-99.72%HAUNTED

Correlation

-0.10over 29 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	HAUNTED	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-41.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.21	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: HAUNTED outperformed BORDR by 2326.1% — measured on the HAUNTED/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Haunted House →Bordrless →