BTC$80,283.31▲ 2.37%ETH$2,416.90▲ 3.96%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.06%BNB$716.21▲ 1.97%XRP$1.32▲ 2.04%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.65▲ 3.54%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.81%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.55%ZEC$1,321.00▲ 0.54%HYPE$82.44▼ 4.57%DOGE$0.0769▲ 2.37%XMR$118.70▲ 0.39%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$77.66▲ 2.97%LINK$11.54▲ 3.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.35%ADA$0.1981▲ 3.56%XLM$0.1661▲ 1.03%BCH$287.60▲ 4.08%NEAR$4.01▼ 1.51%UNI$7.47▲ 0.72%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.08%RAIN$0.006213▼ 0.25%LTC$55.79▲ 1.95%CC$0.1014▲ 2.95%AVAX$8.77▲ 0.98%SUI$0.9238▲ 1.27%USD1$0.9990▲ 0.00%XAUT$4,110.33▲ 1.95%GRAM$1.16▼ 2.69%HBAR$0.0721▲ 2.39%QNT$203.69▲ 2.07%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.20%TAO$234.00▲ 1.63%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0523▲ 2.18%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%BTC$80,283.31▲ 2.37%ETH$2,416.90▲ 3.96%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.06%BNB$716.21▲ 1.97%XRP$1.32▲ 2.04%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.65▲ 3.54%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.81%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.55%ZEC$1,321.00▲ 0.54%HYPE$82.44▼ 4.57%DOGE$0.0769▲ 2.37%XMR$118.70▲ 0.39%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$77.66▲ 2.97%LINK$11.54▲ 3.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.35%ADA$0.1981▲ 3.56%XLM$0.1661▲ 1.03%BCH$287.60▲ 4.08%NEAR$4.01▼ 1.51%UNI$7.47▲ 0.72%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.08%RAIN$0.006213▼ 0.25%LTC$55.79▲ 1.95%CC$0.1014▲ 2.95%AVAX$8.77▲ 0.98%SUI$0.9238▲ 1.27%USD1$0.9990▲ 0.00%XAUT$4,110.33▲ 1.95%GRAM$1.16▼ 2.69%HBAR$0.0721▲ 2.39%QNT$203.69▲ 2.07%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.20%TAO$234.00▲ 1.63%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0523▲ 2.18%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%

HoldFlow vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 20212.9× the size of HoldFlow (HOLD) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.25 across 124 shared trading days). HOLD has been the more volatile of the two, at 194% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.25
Size ratio
1 : 20212.9
HoldFlowHOLD

$8.490e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$8,486
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
194%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171700

24h
-2.68%
Market cap
$171.53M
Volume 24h
$28.99M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
HOLD 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

HOLDWIF

  1. 7 days-93.62%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-95.90%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days-98.51%+21.70%WIF
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.25over 124 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2590d: 0.271y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHOLDWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-99.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.480.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed HOLD by 98.5% — measured on the HOLD/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.