BTC$79,751.59▲ 1.81%ETH$2,397.13▲ 3.42%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$711.68▲ 1.68%XRP$1.31▲ 2.11%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$95.58▲ 2.82%TRX$0.3185▼ 0.18%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,303.19▲ 1.37%HYPE$82.00▼ 3.35%XMR$118.70▼ 0.50%DOGE$0.0761▲ 1.86%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$76.90▲ 2.35%LINK$11.47▲ 3.10%LEO$9.35▲ 0.29%ADA$0.1961▲ 2.93%XLM$0.1646▲ 1.03%BCH$289.60▲ 5.35%NEAR$3.95▼ 1.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.06%UNI$7.33▼ 0.18%LTC$55.31▲ 1.18%RAIN$0.005889▼ 3.73%CC$0.1002▲ 2.11%AVAX$8.71▼ 0.04%SUI$0.9153▲ 1.13%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,107.41▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.14▼ 2.73%HBAR$0.0718▲ 1.58%QNT$201.27▲ 1.44%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.62%TAO$232.10▲ 1.86%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0516▲ 1.20%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%BTC$79,751.59▲ 1.81%ETH$2,397.13▲ 3.42%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$711.68▲ 1.68%XRP$1.31▲ 2.11%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$95.58▲ 2.82%TRX$0.3185▼ 0.18%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,303.19▲ 1.37%HYPE$82.00▼ 3.35%XMR$118.70▼ 0.50%DOGE$0.0761▲ 1.86%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$76.90▲ 2.35%LINK$11.47▲ 3.10%LEO$9.35▲ 0.29%ADA$0.1961▲ 2.93%XLM$0.1646▲ 1.03%BCH$289.60▲ 5.35%NEAR$3.95▼ 1.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.06%UNI$7.33▼ 0.18%LTC$55.31▲ 1.18%RAIN$0.005889▼ 3.73%CC$0.1002▲ 2.11%AVAX$8.71▼ 0.04%SUI$0.9153▲ 1.13%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,107.41▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.14▼ 2.73%HBAR$0.0718▲ 1.58%QNT$201.27▲ 1.44%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.62%TAO$232.10▲ 1.86%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0516▲ 1.20%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%

Hope This Moons Later vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 44637.1× the size of Hope This Moons Later (HTML) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.16 across 33 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 107% annualised.

Correlation
-0.16
Size ratio
1 : 44637.1
Hope This Moons LaterHTML

$4.240e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$3,820
Volume 24h
$5
Volatility (ann.)
110%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171100

24h
-1.61%
Market cap
$170.50M
Volume 24h
$28.96M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
HTML 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

HTMLWIF

  1. 7 days-15.00%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-50.18%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.16over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHTMLWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-50.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.370.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed HTML by 13.5% — measured on the HTML/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.