HUD vs BNB
HUD (HUD) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.35 across 24 shared trading days). HUD has been the more volatile of the two, at 119% annualised against BNB's 50%.
- Correlation
- 0.35
HUD 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB
Performance
HUDBNB
- 7 daysBNB
- 30 days—
- 90 days—
- 1 year—
Correlation
0.35over 24 shared trading days
−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
Risk & extremes
| Metric | HUD | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -62.7% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.53 | 0.54 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed HUD by 59.3% — measured on the HUD/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.